Speeches & Statements
Deputy Secretary Loy Addresses the Maritime
and Port Security 2004 Conference
I want to thank Marine Log for holding this
conference. For
well over a century, you have taught me and thousands of others how
to thrive and prosper in the maritime environment without jeopardizing
safety, violating the law or damaging the environment. We now
need your assistance as we work to protect our ports and the communities
that surround them from terrorists....
Meetings like this, in which industry professionals
can share their wisdom and expertise, are the lifeblood of any "new era." This
is no exception.
All of us, government and industry alike, face
changes in the way we used to do business. We must meet hard deadlines and difficult
mandates. And we do not have the luxury of delegating our responsibilities
to someone else.
I'm reminded of a quote by the great humorist
Will Rogers. During
World War I, Rogers said he had the perfect answer to the German U-Boats
that were menacing American and British ships on the high seas. Rogers's
proposal? Heat the ocean until it boiled. When asked how
he would do it, he said, "Hey, that's someone else's problem; I'm
just the idea man."
The "someone else" in our current challenge is every one of
us. As we found on countless ships of our collective past, this
one is an "all-hands" evolution. Our grandparents had World
War I - our parents had World War II and Korea - now, we have the
global
war on terrorism.
On the wall in my office is a photograph of
the ruins of the World Trade Center, taken from a helicopter three
days after 9-11. It
is a constant reminder to me of the work that must be done to secure
our homeland and ensure freedom's future.
It is chilling to think that eight years earlier,
the Twin Towers were viewed from a helicopter by Ramzi Yousef, the
mastermind of the
first World Trade Center bombing, while in police custody. "Look
down there," he was told by an FBI agent in the chopper. "They're
still standing." Yousef replied, "They wouldn't be, if I had
had enough money and explosives."
That photograph reminds me that we must never
again underestimate our enemy. And we must never again be caught unaware. When
it comes to homeland security, surprise is no longer an option.
We must always seek to anticipate the terrorists'
next move - which may be completely different from their last. If they came by
truck in 1993 - and by plane in 2001 - their next journey might very
well be by ship. The same sea-lanes that have brought freedom
and prosperity to so many people on this earth, could be traveled
in an attempt to destroy that freedom.
President John F. Kennedy, a Navy man - everyone's
entitled to one mistake! - liked to quote the Old Breton Fisherman's
Prayer: "Oh God,
thy sea is so great and my boat is so small."
On September 11th, 2001, those oceans, which had shielded America
from direct attack for nearly two centuries, no longer protected us
from terrorists who hid among us and used our own freedom as a weapon
against us.
The terrorists hit us like a perfect storm. In so doing, they
awakened us from our complacent nap and made us shockingly aware of
new vulnerabilities. It's been said that the future arrives unannounced. Well,
for us, the future arrived on 9-11-01. And there is no going
back.
This quest we often hear for a "return to normalcy" - there will be
no such thing in our lifetime. We're constructing the new normalcy
and our only choice will be to adapt.
Days after 9-11, President Bush described us
as "a country awakened
to danger and called to defend freedom." Overnight, we learned
that our old capabilities and institutions, designed for the Cold War,
were insufficient against a new enemy - an enemy with no flag, no borders,
no President - and no remorse. Overnight, we knew had to retool
and reorganize.
Two years later, we are, as the President said
in his State of the Union Address, "rising to meet" our new responsibilities, and our "vigilance
is protecting America." We are not only adapting to this new
normalcy - we are shaping it!
What is this new normalcy? It is awareness
of our enemies, our friends and ourselves.
It is ports and industry developing their own security plans, not
being dictated to from above.
It is an activity set capable not only of stopping terrorists, but
the criminals and smugglers who support them.
It is time-saving and money-saving incentives that reward both innovation
and coordination to keep commerce flowing.
And it is a Department of Homeland Security that backs you up.
Let me illustrate the dramatic changes we've seen in these past two
years:
-
Before September 11th, the idea of mobilizing
22 separate agencies into a single unit with a single primary
mission was rarely discussed,
even by academics. Today, the Department of Homeland Security
is a robust reality, with 180,000 dedicated patriots working
every day
in "a unified national effort to secure America."
-
Before September 11th, airport ticket agents
asked if you packed your own bags - and largely ignored your
answer. Today, from
the curb to the cabin to the cockpit, new technology and
thousands of highly trained screeners and air marshals are making
a very real
difference.
-
Before September 11th, the idea of a nationwide
biometrics-based system to check visa status was the topic of
some discussion - but
not much else. Now, US-VISIT is deployed across the country. In
its first few weeks, dozens of "watch list" hits have been made -
and a fugitive, on the lam from federal custody for 20 years, has
been caught. [Terrorists may lie - but fingerprints tell
the truth!]
-
Before September 11th, our national stockpile
of medications to protect Americans against a bioterrorist attack
was drastically undersupplied. Today,
we have stockpiled a billion doses of antibiotics and vaccines,
including enough smallpox vaccine for every man, woman, and child
in America.
-
Before September 11th, federal agencies
rarely shared vital information with state and local officials
and law enforcement. Today we
have secure communications technologies and expanded security clearances
at every level of government. And our Homeland Security
Advisory System is creating a constant two-way flow of information
and responsiveness.
Today, we are more secure and better prepared than ever before - and
we reach a higher level of readiness every day.
So what has made the difference? We have made the protection
of our people and way of life the highest charge of our nation. Just
as importantly, we've done it without compromising the qualities that
make us Americans. We refuse to accept closed doors and raised
walls as the price of security.
Our welcoming nature and our global economic
leadership must be strengthened, not weakened, by our new security
resolve. And they will be.
The Department of Homeland Security will preserve our political and
economic freedoms even as we protect lives - that is our vision of
homeland security.
This vision will be achieved by concentrating on several strategic
goals:
First - and, in my opinion, most important -
is awareness - of the enemy and ourselves. Acute awareness
is the key to goal number two: prevention.
We now collect and fuse intelligence in order
to identify the latest threats - and we place those threats in context: are
they credible and corroborated?
At the same time, we assess our vulnerabilities
to those threats, then share the information with our state, local
and tribal partners. For
the first time as a nation, we have brought those capabilities
together, under one roof.
Third, we must protect our people, communities, institutions and infrastructure
from acts of terrorism, as well as natural disasters and other emergencies.
We are building an "all-hazards" preparedness
capability to improve our readiness and mitigate the damage, whether
caused by man or Mother
Nature.
Fourth and fifth, we must ensure an adequate
response and recovery. We
are fully prepared to help coordinate and manage the effort by
states and localities and the private sector to prevent loss of lives,
restore
services and rebuild communities.
Sixth, organizational excellence. We are creating a culture
that promotes teamwork, mutual respect and accountability. We're
building a Department that breaks with the bureaucratic baggage of
the past and strikes out to create the model agency for the new century.
Seventh and finally, service. Legitimate trade, travel and immigration
have made this nation what it is. Our homeland security measures
must not obstruct these endeavors, but facilitate them.
Nowhere has the nexus between security and the
economy been more starkly illustrated than at our nation's airports. That's been the front-page
focus since 9-11 because of what happened on 9-11. But in this
room we know only too well that oceans and sea-lanes and seaports
are the avenues of freedom - and prosperity.
Maritime industries contribute more than one
trillion dollars to the annual GDP. That commerce travels through
3.4 million square miles of exclusive economic zone and along more
than 95,000 miles of
coastline, dotted by about 360 seaports.
Every year, more than 7,500 ships make port calls - carrying 6.5 million
passengers, six million containers and one billion tons of petroleum.
All in all, 95 percent of our commerce is carried
through our seaports. And
there's no let-up on the horizon: worldwide, intermodal shipping
is expected to increase by two-thirds over the next six years; world
trade is projected to double by 2020. To sustain our prosperity,
we must be able to accommodate this increase.
Our ships and ports are more valuable to the
global economy than any other mode of transportation - and, I would
suggest, more vulnerable,
especially to an enemy whose self-professed desire is to "destroy
our economy."
After September 11th, it took days to restore movement by aviation;
the aftermath of losing several ports would be measured in months,
if not years.
Remember that the impact of a relatively benign labor strike on the
West Coast two years ago was a not-so-benign $20 billion or more.
The threat is real. Now, the biggest challenge
facing our marine transportation system is to ensure that legitimate
cargo is not needlessly
delayed as we and other nations institute new security measures.
Fortunately, we have a few things going for
us. Start with attitude.
As the gentleman who follows me this morning,
former Coast Guard Cmdr. Stephen Flynn put it, "Talking about port security" before 9-11 "was
like being a teetotaler at a New Year's party."
No longer. Now, the will to improve security is there, because
the awareness is there. One would truly have to be brain-dead
to fail to recognize the legitimacy of the threat.
Another advantage is our capabilities. Businesses face many
more problems than terrorism - problems such as theft, pilferage and
fraud. An estimated $10 billion is annually lost to cargo theft.
The same measures that can be used to thwart
these crimes - perimeter security, employee background checks, separate "high-value" safe rooms,
and tamper-evident containers, to name a few - can be applied to the
fight against terrorism. And I applaud industry's efforts to
share best practices as we move forward.
For our part, the Department of Homeland Security
is working hard to stop drug and alien smuggling, identity theft,
money laundering,
electronic crimes and the other "enabling" crimes that give terrorists
the "lifeblood" they need to survive.
And we are tapping into extensive capabilities and experience in doing
so - the United States Secret Service; our dedicated ICE agents; and,
of course, the U.S. Coast Guard, which has stopped tons of drugs and
thousands of undocumented immigrants from entering the U.S. illegally
by sea.
Finally, we have the incentive to act - based on the law.
You are all aware of the Maritime Transportation
Security Act. The
final rules for the act were published and announced last fall.
The Act requires port officials, ships' captains and facility operators
to submit individualized security plans to the Department for approval.
We realize that one size does not fit all. The
plans should be flexible, with the ability to ratchet protective
measures up or
down, based on the threat.
They should utilize technology, such as the new Automatic Identification
System, which will help us quickly separate law-abiding vessels from
suspect ones.
And they should meet or exceed basic national and international standards
so our response to a terrorist threat or attack is coordinated, not
chaotic.
The aim is to strengthen and bring consistency to maritime security,
without mandating a one-size fits all approach.
We understand there will be short-term costs,
particularly for many smaller ports with less security experience. We
are fully engaged with the maritime industry to help alleviate the
burden.
Know that these rules were developed with the
full cooperation of the private sector. We solicited more than
2,000 comments and recommendations, and held public meetings in New
Orleans, Cleveland,
Seattle, New York City and many other cities with a vital interest.
The implementation of these plans will complement
our Department's already strong response. Our posture is one of "layered security" -
pushing our borders continuously outward from American shores.
This philosophy is grounded in history. The great 19th Century
naval strategist Alfred Thayer Mahan believed that a secure nation
required more than coastal defense. It required building new
and bigger ships and deploying them all over the world to impress
our friends and intimidate our enemies.
Today we use this approach not to project power, but to share information
with and help secure all free nations.
Currently, information regarding nearly 100
percent of all containerized cargo is carefully screened by DHS before
it arrives in a U.S. port. It
starts with our landmark Container Security Initiative. Under
CSI, U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspectors are placed at the
world's top seaports, where they work with their foreign counterparts
to screen and label cargo as "higher-risk" or "low-risk" long before
it reaches the U.S.
The process is aided immeasurably by our new "24-hour rule," which
requires electronic transmission of advance cargo manifests from U.S.-bound
sea carriers a day in advance of loading. Early reports from
industry show that the 24-hour rule is aiding not just security,
but productivity.
The information is run through our Automated Targeting System, which
compares it against law enforcement data, the latest threat intelligence
and the ships' history.
Finally, the higher-risk shipments are physically
inspected for terrorist weapons and contraband prior to being released
from the port of entry. Last
July, for instance, CBP inspectors using ATS in Portland, Oregon, seized
a cache of weapons bound for El Salvador. [Mahan would be proud!]
The Department is helping in other ways. We've awarded or made
available a total of nearly $350 million in port security grants [over
two years]. It will provide new patrol boats, surveillance
equipment, command and control facilities - whatever it takes.
In addition, the budget the President signed last fall contains:
-
$62 million to expand the CSI.
-
$30 million to improve our "known shipper
program.
-
$64 million for state-of-the-art non-intrusive inspection systems,
including radiation detectors and port-based VACIS machines.
-
$14 million to double the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism;
more than 5,000 companies have joined, eager to reap the economic
benefits of a secure supply chain.
-
And finally, $58 million under Operation
Safe Commerce to analyze security practices and provide a "test-bed" for
innovations at our highest-volume ports.
Overall spending on homeland security will have
tripled in just over two years. We cannot guarantee 100 percent safety. But
these measures have made our ports - and our nation - a much safer
place.
The U.S. Coast Guard has played a big part in developing the new rules
- and continues to play a key role in securing our ports and port communities.
After 9-11, the Coast Guard set out to design
a maritime security strategy that could conform to the mission and
goals of the Department,
as well as complement the National Strategy on Homeland Security. We
concentrated on five principle elements:
First, enhancing our presence and response capabilities. We
wanted to detect, intercept and interdict potential threats as far
out to sea as possible. Since 9-11, the Coast Guard has mobilized
nearly 4,000 reservists and conducted more than 40,000 security patrols
by sea and air.
Second, identifying and controlling high-interest
vessels. We
began by requiring all foreign-flag vessels to check in 96 hours prior
to arrival, instead of 24. Since 9-11, we've boarded or escorted
approximately 15,000 high-interest vessels.
Third, identifying and protecting nearby critical
infrastructure - chemical plants, refineries and bridges, 85 percent
of which is owned
by the private sector. These are prioritized by risk, so we can
target our resources to save the most lives. It's interesting
that estimates show the top 25 ports in the nation account for about
98 percent of container traffic. We must concentrate on protecting
these "pressure points" - because we know al Qaeda is concentrating
on them, too.
That's why, with the 2004 budget, we more than
double the number of Maritime Safety and Security Teams, to 13. Each
team is made up of 90 men and women and six boats, enabling us to
protect our most
vulnerable assets on land and at sea.
Fourth, international and domestic outreach. We cannot succeed
at home unless we develop partnerships abroad. We continue
to work closely with foreign ports as well as the International Maritime
Organization.
Finally, and above all, the Coast Guard created what we call Maritime
Domain Awareness.
What is MDA? It is threat intelligence collected from every
source and analyzed; knowledge of the area, conditions and our capabilities;
then the complete picture shared with our friends and partners. Early
information is key to stopping terrorism. The earlier we can
spot trends and red flags, the more quickly we can respond.
In sum, we are building new barriers to the "bad guys" - and new bridges
to the "good guys." This is crucial. The relationships
we create now will be the ones we rely on in a crisis. We cannot
afford to wait to create them.
The great Civil War general Joshua Chamberlain
put it this way: "A
great and free country is not merely defense and protection. For
every earnest spirit, it is opportunity and inspiration. The
best of each being given to all, the best of all returns to each."
Let me add one final thought. The Department of Homeland Security
is not an "in-box"-type agency. We have a clear vision for
what a secure homeland will look like by the end of the decade or
before.
By then, every community will have a preparedness plan organized down
to the neighborhood level so that school children, moms and dads, and
senior citizens will know how to protect themselves should another
terrorist attack occur.
By then, every state will not only have identified
their most vulnerable roads, bridges, monuments, and power plants,
but will know what needs
to be done to "harden" those targets.
By then, global security measures will protect our cyber networks
- with capabilities that shut down hackers right at the keyboard.
By then, sensors will not only be able to detect dangerous bioagents,
but quickly contain them as well.
Finally, the world's companies will ship their goods with maximum
security - and, I might add, reliability - while legitimate travelers
speed across our borders and through our airports.
Through layered defenses on land and sea, we will have deterred threats,
foiled attacks and captured many an enemy of freedom - and saved countless
lives in the process.
This is a vision that is reasonable and real - and I am proud to say
has been embraced throughout the country with a sense of urgency, commitment,
and passion unrivaled in my experience.
When General George Marshall spoke to Harvard
University for the first time about his plan to reconstruct Europe
following World War II, he
said that "with foresight, and a willingness on the part of our people
to face up to the vast responsibility which history has clearly placed
upon our country, the difficulties I have outlined can and will be
overcome."
We have a task in front of us not unlike that
faced by Secretary of State Marshall - a task driven by social, human,
and economic concerns
- as well as a willingness to see that vision through to completion. Simply
put, it's our turn on watch.
Thank you for embracing this vision. I
look forward to working with you in the days and months ahead to
make it a reality.